This website only uses technically necessary cookies. No tracking, no analytics.
Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc
FILQ-A#715
$101.61+0.00%
Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc (FILQ-A) is a digital asset entry listed under the ticker FILQ-A. Its name signals a USD-denominated digital liquidity fund structure, while its market profile hinges on three figures: a current price of $100.58, a market capitalization of $45,085,032 and rank 417 by market cap. That mix makes any Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc analysis July readers might pursue easier to frame around valuation than short-term trading action.
The standout number sits on the volume line: 24-hour turnover of $0. With no trading recorded over the past day, the quoted price may not reflect active two-sided discovery. That distinction matters for anyone weighing entries, exits or the freshness of the last print — a headline price loses some of its meaning when there is no visible turnover behind it. Any serious Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc report should give that lack of volume as much weight as the market cap itself.
The overall picture is narrow but clean. FILQ-A sits just above $100, carries roughly $45.09 million in market value and shows no recorded 24-hour trading activity. The main practical risk is liquidity visibility: if trading remains absent, gauging demand or execution conditions from market data alone becomes harder, and any Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc forecast has to acknowledge that gap.
This content was created with the assistance of generative AI. Learn more
What is Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc? A quick explainer
FILQ-A is the ticker for Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc, a digital asset entry priced at $100.58. Market cap sits near $45.09 million, but 24-hour volume is $0, so liquidity visibility is the key thing to watch.
Security check
Smart contract risk scan — checks for honeypots, hidden taxes and more.
This coin carries 2 risk flags. Not suitable for beginners. If you invest anyway: only money you can afford to lose entirely. No DCA plans, no leverage, no FOMO buys after a pump.
AI analysis
Clear bullish / neutral / bearish signal based on market data, on-chain security and macro signals.
Analysis from September 4, 2026
This analysis is refreshed automatically in the background.
Rating
Bearish79% confident
Confidence
Summary
FILQ-A currently has a predominantly strained data picture, led by weak security and ownership indicators. Its security trust score is only 35, while all recorded supply is concentrated among the top 10 addresses and the fund has just 3 recorded holders. Some safeguards are present: the contract is open source, cannot create additional tokens under its current setup, and is not flagged as a honeypot. The Fear & Greed Index is 74, labeled Greed, after rising 6 points over seven days; this reflects a favorable wider crypto mood but also elevated enthusiasm that can make markets more vulnerable to reversals. For investors, the absence of current price, volume, on-chain activity, developer activity, and token-unlock data creates substantial uncertainty around liquidity, usage, and future supply pressure.
📰 Current News & Events
No current news available at this time. There are therefore no confirmed FILQ-A announcements, fund events, or regulatory developments that can explain recent activity. Any effect from current events cannot be separated from the wider market environment.
📈 Price Movement Analysis
The current FILQ-A price and its 24-hour, 7-day, and 30-day changes are unavailable, so recent price movement cannot be measured reliably. Market capitalization and transaction volume are also unavailable, making it impossible to judge market depth or whether activity has increased. The only price reference is an all-time high of 100.58 recorded on July 8, 2026. Although wider crypto sentiment has strengthened, there is not enough coin-specific information to connect that mood to FILQ-A's price.
Strengths
✅The smart contract is open source, meaning its code can be publicly inspected. This provides more transparency than a closed contract, although no audit information is available.
✅FILQ-A is not flagged as a honeypot, a malicious contract design that can prevent users from exiting a token position. This removes one common smart-contract warning sign.
✅The contract is listed as non-mintable under its current setup, so it cannot simply create additional units through the existing mint function. However, its upgradeable structure means this safeguard should not be viewed in isolation.
✅The wider market backdrop is risk-friendly, with the Fear & Greed Index at 74 and rising. Falling annual inflation, from 3.73% to 3.54%, also reduces one source of macroeconomic pressure.
Risks
⚠️The security trust score is only 35, which signals meaningful concerns around the contract's overall risk profile. No separate audit or stronger security evidence is available to offset this low score.
⚠️Ownership is extremely concentrated: there are only 3 recorded holders, and the top 10 addresses control 100% of the supply. Decisions or transfers by a very small number of addresses could therefore have an outsized effect.
⚠️The contract uses a proxy, meaning its operating logic can potentially be upgraded without replacing the token address. This creates governance and control risk because the future behavior of the contract may depend on whoever controls those upgrades.
⚠️Current price, volume, market capitalization, on-chain flows, and social sentiment are unavailable. As a result, liquidity conditions, real usage, and market pressure cannot be independently assessed.
⚠️Developer activity and token-unlock information are unavailable. There is therefore no basis for evaluating ongoing technical maintenance or whether additional supply could enter circulation.
📊 Macro context
The Fear & Greed Index stands at 74, labeled Greed, and has risen from 68 over seven days, showing that optimism across the broader crypto market is strengthening. This can support risk assets, but elevated enthusiasm also increases the possibility of sentiment-driven reversals; a reliable 90-day comparison is unavailable. The Federal Funds Rate is unchanged at 3.63%, while annual inflation has eased from 3.73% to 3.54%, creating a somewhat less restrictive backdrop. Against that, the Dollar Index has increased from 118.36 to 118.75, and a stronger dollar can pressure crypto markets; current regulatory developments specific to FILQ-A are unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
How does the model assess Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc right now?
The current picture is predominantly strained because the security score is 35 and all recorded supply is concentrated among only 3 holders. Open-source code, non-mintable status, and the absence of a honeypot flag are constructive, but they do not outweigh the concentration and information gaps.
What is driving FILQ-A's price right now?
The current price and its 24-hour, 7-day, and 30-day changes are unavailable, so no reliable price driver can be identified. Wider crypto sentiment is optimistic at a Fear & Greed reading of 74, but there is no evidence showing how strongly that has affected FILQ-A.
What are the main strengths and risks for FILQ-A?
The main strengths are transparent code, no honeypot warning, and no active mint function under the current contract setup. The largest risks are a security score of 35, complete concentration among the top addresses, proxy-based upgrade control, and missing information on liquidity, development, on-chain flows, and token unlocks.
FILQ-A is an Ethereum-based tokenized money market fund, but the available data raises significant concerns for this investment research. Its smart-contract trust score sits at just 35, and ownership concentration is extreme: only 3 holders are listed, with the top 10 accounts controlling 100% of the supply. Tracked GitHub data shows no commits, merged contributions, or active contributors, leaving little public evidence of ongoing technical maintenance. Broader crypto sentiment remains upbeat, with the Fear & Greed Index at 71 (Greed), though its seven-day trend slipped from 72 to 71 — and when optimism runs this high, the risk of sudden market reversals tends to grow. Falling inflation and a slightly weaker dollar offer a more supportive macro backdrop, but FILQ-A's current price, trading activity, on-chain flows, news, and token-unlock schedule are all unavailable. Weighing everything together, these information gaps combined with weak security and ownership indicators outweigh the positives — namely open-source code, disabled minting, and the absence of a honeypot warning.
Aug 20, 2026, 8:08 PM
BearishBearish · 78% confident
FILQ-A is difficult to evaluate right now because basic figures — price, trading volume, market value, and network-flow data — simply aren't available. The biggest red flag in this coin analysis is a low smart-contract trust score of 35, paired with a contract that can be upgraded through a proxy structure. Ownership is also extremely concentrated: only 3 addresses are recorded, and the ten largest addresses control 100% of the circulating units. Broader crypto sentiment tells a different story, with the Fear & Greed Index at 62 (Greed territory) after climbing from 29, a 33-point jump. But for anyone weighing this token, that improved market mood doesn't offset the contract risk, ownership concentration, absence of GitHub activity, and significant gaps in coin-specific transparency.
Aug 20, 2026, 8:01 PM
BearishBearish · 82% confident
This coin analysis paints a strained picture for Fidelity USD Digital Liquidity Fund-Acc (FILQ-A), even as sentiment across the wider crypto market brightens. The Fear & Greed Index now sits at 62, labeled Greed, up sharply from 29 — a 33-point jump that signals growing confidence but also raises the risk of overheated optimism. Coin-specific concerns weigh far more heavily on this coin forecast: the security trust score is just 35, only three holders control 100% of the recorded supply, and the contract runs on an upgradeable proxy structure. No visible GitHub development activity was recorded over the past four weeks, and price, trading volume, on-chain activity, and token-unlock data are all unavailable. Despite the friendlier market backdrop, the lack of transparency and extreme ownership concentration make this fund token genuinely difficult to evaluate.
